Local officials initially were unfazed by complaints that the constant surveillance raised serious privacy concerns.

Matthew Cavedon (Emory University - Center for the Study of Law and Religion) has posted Danger, Safety, and the Fourth Amendment: Barnes v. Felix (2024-25 Cato Supreme Court Review) on SSRN. Here is ...

As people of faith, we cannot abide losing the basic right to provide care and compassion,” Bishop Brenda Bos of the ELCA’s ...

Obeying the Constitution is not supposed to be an option, but as long as Trump continues defying it without consequence, as long as he isn’t stopped by the other two branches of government, we will ...

A protester argued that a North Carolina city’s restriction on amplifiers outside of medical clinics was unconstitutionally ...

Those were Eighth Amendment cases. Villarreal's, meanwhile, is a First and Fourth Amendment case, so they are not sufficiently analogous, Jones concluded.

Christopher Martinez appeared in court today to present his case that ICE violated his Fourth Amendment rights while protestors outside brought banners and lined outside the door. Protestors ...

In a unanimous decision, the Ohio Supreme Court said location information voluntarily given to cell phone applications is not protected by the 4th Amendment.

Immigration arrests violated the Fourth Amendment, Chicago lawyers argue in court Attorneys accused two government agencies of arresting 25 people in the Midwest without warrants and probable ...

Cango Inc. Announces Fourth Amendment to Share-Settled Crypto Mining Assets Acquisitions PR Newswire HONG KONG, June 23, 2025 ...

The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places. What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home or office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment Protection.

The post New Montana Law Blocks the State From Buying Private Data To Skirt the Fourth Amendment appeared first on Reason.com.