Many California cities require developers to build affordable housing or pay fees to support construction of those units. A new lawsuit contends those fees are unconstitutional.

A ruling immunizing political gerrymanders from review by federal courts may have given Republicans an opportunity to hold ...

A Northern California property owner for years has fought a $23,400 traffic mitigation fee that he was charged for building a ...

While generally endorsing forum selection clauses, a unanimous California Supreme Court said judges should examine such ...

The California Supreme Court’s July 21 decision in EpicentRx, Inc. v. Superior Court resolves a longstanding uncertainty around enforcement of ...

WASHINGTON − Bacon and pork chops are not back on the menu at the Supreme Court. The high court on June 30 rejected another challenge to California’s controversial animal-welfare law, two ...

California Gov. Gavin Newsom, alongside California's Attorney General, has released a statement regarding the Supreme Court issuing a 6-3 ruling after allowing President Donald J. Trump's ...

The Supreme Court is supposed to serve as a safeguard against presidential overreach, not incentivize it.” Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) also had some choice words after the ruling.

In a closely watched decision issued on July 21, 2025, the California Supreme Court, in EpicentRx, Inc. v. Superior Court, held that a forum ...