The Washington Post editorial board argued a federal judge's ruling against congressional Medicaid restrictions on abortion providers represented judicial overreach.

You know leftist judicial activism has gone too far when an outlet like the Washington Post calls it out. On Tuesday, the ...

This White House has aggressively tried to withhold federal money from programs it dislikes. Those efforts have rightly faced ...

U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani appears to be on a crusade to ensure that Planned Parenthood receives taxpayer funding ...

Columbia University expels dozens of students for pro-passage protests amid political pressure in the US The University of ...

Justice Amy Coney Barrett stands at a crossroads in her judicial career, and recent scrutiny over her decisions is raising critical questions about her commitment to originalist principles that many ...

Some legislators, along with the well-funded education-industrial lobby, keep repeating the false claim that Alaska’s ...

Nominee is considered a controversial figure in the Trump administration’s aggressive shake-up of the Justice Department.

Fred O. Smith, Jr. (Stanford Law School) has posted Judicial Bystanding (72 UCLA L. Rev. __ (2025)) on SSRN. Here is the abstract: Chief Justice John Marshall famously wrote in Cohens v. Virginia that ...

Jackson’s judicial philosophy mirrors that of then-Supreme Court Associate Justice Thurgood Marshall, who described his ...

In an era marked by growing friction between environmental preservation and urban development, the decision of the Bombay ...

Ketanji Brown Jackson's Dissenting Agenda** The rise of judicial activism in America has reached a troubling zenith with the appointment of Justice ...